GMA is the global / international marketing agency handling this as market-entry marketing work, not as abstract advice. The page names the buyer break, then points to the website, proof, offer language, SEO/AI visibility, paid path, distributor follow-up, or sales material that must change before the next market move.
Short answer: he is half right. The product is fine. The frame is not. The buyer understood the demo and sorted the company wrong on slide one.
German engineering register treats capability as the load-bearing claim. The deck opens with company history, certification, engineering staff, Fertigungstiefe. The implicit argument is that the engineering is correct and the outcome follows. This works at home because the home buyer judges the same way. US engineering register is inverted: the deck is expected to open with peer-set comparables and a quantified outcome. Capability sits later, as supporting proof. The same German engineering deck, in front of a US procurement buyer, sorts into engineering-vendor on slide one. Every meeting from that point is downstream of a sort that already happened. The hire judges the warm room as progress. The sort already priced the deal out.
Per the US Bureau of Economic Analysis FDI inflows 2025, foreign vendor presence in US procurement is at a multi-year high and the procurement sort is faster, not friendlier. White & Case M&A Explorer 2026 shows the same buyer-language problem appearing in diligence as well: acquirers evaluation German-style decks flag commercial-register risk before they flag anything technical. The hire is feeling the result. The hire is the second person in line to lose patience after the buyer.
The replacement-hire cycle costs $400k-$700k loaded per loop. The same hire who reports "Americans don't get our product" often reports a different number inside ninety days after a register rebuild. The seat was always fine. The system inside the seat was the problem.
Buyer-language pattern. The company works at home. The US buyer still asks what category it belongs in, why the proof is relevant here, and what the next low-risk step should be.
Related answers and pains
A Market-Entry Marketing Sprint covers six to ten weeks of register rebuild for one US category. The output is a deck, a hero, a case-study set, and a sales-call kit the US hire can sell inside. A Cross-Border Marketing Build runs three to six months for multi-channel US presence. A Global Marketing Partnership is monthly retainer with a twelve-month minimum. Commercial terms are set after fit and scope are clear. No public price bands are published.
If the market is not responding, the first question is simple: what is the buyer not seeing, trusting, or doing yet?
| Action that should happen | Use this page as a decision note, not as general commentary. It should answer one market-entry tension. |
| What may be unclear | The tension is that the company may be strong at home while the new-market buyers evaluate the proof, language, channel, price, or follow-up as weak. |
| What to inspect | The consequence is wasted spend, slower pipeline, distributor drift, weak RFQs, or buyers who like the product but do not move. |
| Next step | Use the example on this page to decide whether the next move is more context, /engagements/, or /contact/#inquiry. |
Reference material used while shaping this page: Roland Berger Mittelstand survey 2025-2026, US BEA FDI inflows 2025, White & Case M&A Explorer 2026, IMAP German Mid-Cap M&A 2026, Forrester B2B AI buyer-agent forecast.