Fiduciaries and advisors.
The audience overview for private-client lawyers, trust officers, foundation officers, and single-family-office principals introducing principals into US operating engagements.
See the audience →
Published 29 April 2026 · Global Marketing Agency
The moment is recurring and recognisable. A long-time principal, a trust beneficiary, a family-office principal, a foundation founder, or a private-client client of the fiduciary has a US commercial situation that has stopped working. The principal owns or controls a US operating company, or owns the home-base operating company that has put commercial weight into the US, or has acquired a US business that is not integrating commercially, or is the beneficiary of a US-facing portfolio that is producing operating drag the structure cannot absorb. The home base is fine. The European, Swiss, UK, Singaporean, or Gulf head office, the family office, the trust, the foundation, the holding-company structure, all functioning. The US operating layer is the layer that has stalled.
The fiduciary sees the moment in a particular way that operating principals rarely see themselves. The fiduciary reads the principal's quarterly review or annual review, the family-office investment committee notes, the trust's reporting on the US operating company, or the foundation's notes on the US-based programme. The numbers are not the right shape. The US business is consuming capital without producing the expected commercial trajectory. The principal, in the next conversation, describes the US country head as not yet finding traction, the US channel partners as slower than expected, or the US procurement pipeline as building more slowly than the home pipeline. The fiduciary recognises the pattern faster than the principal does, because the fiduciary has seen it before in adjacent principals.
The fiduciary's instinct, at this point, is to suggest that the principal needs commercial help. The instinct is correct. The instinct is also operationally complicated, because the fiduciary's standard professional vocabulary covers legal, tax, fiduciary, trust, foundation, regulatory, and structuring questions, and does not cover US commercial marketing architecture. The fiduciary is not equipped to deliver the commercial work and should not deliver it; the fiduciary is equipped to recognise that the work is needed.
The fiduciary then encounters the second operational problem: the firms that deliver the commercial work, in many jurisdictions, operate on referral-commission economics. The marketing agency, the management consultancy, the corporate-strategy boutique, or the US country-head executive-search firm pays a finder's fee, a referral commission, or a success fee to the introducing party. In some jurisdictions and some professional contexts, this is acceptable with disclosure. In most fiduciary contexts, it is not, regardless of disclosure, because the fiduciary's standing in the principal relationship rests on the perception that the fiduciary is advising on the principal's interest alone.
The fiduciary therefore faces a structural dilemma. The principal needs the work. The fiduciary cannot deliver the work. The available delivery firms operate on commission. Introducing the principal to a commission-paying firm risks the fiduciary's professional standing in the principal relationship, regardless of the quality of the work the firm delivers. Many fiduciaries, faced with this dilemma, do not introduce. The principal then continues without the work, the US operating drag continues, and the fiduciary watches the principal's situation deteriorate without being able to act on the recognition.
The revenue-neutral architecture is the structural fix to the fiduciary's dilemma. The fiduciary can introduce without commercial conflict. The fiduciary's standing in the principal relationship is preserved. The principal gets the work. The firm gets the engagement on its standard commercial terms. The architecture is the part that resolves the structural problem; the work itself is the same work the firm delivers in any other engagement.
The mechanism by which commission-based referral breaks fiduciary posture is structural, not regulatory. In some jurisdictions and some professional contexts, a disclosed referral fee is permissible under the relevant code of conduct. The structural problem is not whether the fee is permissible. The structural problem is what the fee does to the principal's reading of the fiduciary's advice.
The fiduciary's relationship with the principal rests on a specific reading contract. The principal pays the fiduciary, directly or through the fee structure of the trust, the foundation, the family office, or the private-client engagement. The fiduciary advises in the principal's interest. The principal's reading of the fiduciary's advice is anchored in the assumption that the fiduciary's compensation comes from the principal alone, and that no third party is paying the fiduciary in connection with the advice. When that assumption breaks, the principal's reading of the advice changes structurally, regardless of whether the fiduciary's actual judgement has changed.
A disclosed referral fee, even at modest scale, breaks the assumption. The fiduciary advises the principal to engage a US commercial marketing firm. The fiduciary discloses that the firm pays a referral fee. The principal, reading the disclosure, now reads two things rather than one: the fiduciary's professional judgement that the firm is the right firm, and the fiduciary's commercial interest in the principal engaging the firm. Even if the principal trusts the fiduciary completely, the principal cannot un-read the second variable. The reading contract has shifted from one-axis (fiduciary's professional judgement) to two-axis (judgement plus interest). The fiduciary's advice has lost its single-axis weight.
The single-axis weight is not a marketing claim. It is the operational asset the fiduciary's practice rests on. Multi-decade fiduciary relationships are built on the principal's continuous reading of the fiduciary's advice as unconflicted. Each commission-based referral, regardless of its individual scale, introduces a small but cumulative degradation in the principal's reading of the fiduciary's advice. The cumulative degradation, over years, produces a fiduciary whose practice is technically sound but whose professional standing in the principal relationship has eroded. The erosion is not visible in any single transaction. The erosion is visible in the medium-term economics of the practice.
The revenue-neutral architecture removes the second axis. The fiduciary advises the principal to engage the firm. There is no referral fee. There is no finder's commission. There is no success fee paid to the fiduciary. The principal reads the fiduciary's advice on a single axis: professional judgement. The fiduciary's standing is preserved. The fiduciary can introduce as many principals as the fiduciary's professional judgement supports, without the cumulative erosion. The fiduciary's practice gains a structural commercial channel for principals it can refer; the fiduciary's commercial standing in the principal relationship is unchanged.
The architecture is also robust to scrutiny. Where a code of professional conduct, a regulator, or a court reviews the fiduciary's introduction practice, the absence of any commission flow is a defensible posture in every jurisdiction the firm has operated in. Where a principal's adult heirs, a successor trustee, or a foundation board reviews historic introductions made by the fiduciary, the absence of commission flow is a posture the fiduciary's estate can defend without ambiguity. The architecture is, in addition to commercially neutral, governance-clean across multi-decade reading.
The architecture has three operational properties worth naming explicitly.
First, the introduction itself is unpriced. The fiduciary contacts the firm. The firm receives the introduction. No financial instrument flows from the firm to the fiduciary in connection with the introduction. There is no formal referral agreement, no signed referral contract, no contingent compensation, and no informal expectation. The introduction is a piece of professional context, not a commercial transaction.
Second, the work is priced separately to the principal on the firm's standard commercial terms. The firm scopes a Market Entry Sprint, a Cross-Border Build, or a Group Partnership. The principal engages the firm directly. The firm bills the principal directly. The firm's compensation is the work the principal pays for. No portion of that compensation is allocated, reserved, or rebated to the introducing fiduciary. The fiduciary has no financial visibility into the firm's economics with the principal beyond what the principal chooses to share with the fiduciary. The fiduciary is operationally outside the firm's commercial relationship with the principal, although the fiduciary may be inside the operational relationship if the engagement requires fiduciary input.
Third, the fiduciary remains the principal's primary relationship for the matters that sit inside the fiduciary's professional remit. The firm does not, through the introduction, displace the fiduciary in the principal relationship. The fiduciary continues to advise on legal, tax, trust, foundation, fiduciary, structuring, and governance questions. The firm operates on the US commercial marketing architecture. Where the two areas intersect, the firm and the fiduciary coordinate, with the principal's authorisation and inside the principal's existing relationship architecture.
The three properties together produce a relationship economics that is unusual in the marketing and consulting industry but unremarkable in the fiduciary world. Many fiduciary networks operate on similar revenue-neutral introduction principles among themselves: a Zurich private-client lawyer introducing to a Geneva trust officer does not pay a commission, and a London tax adviser introducing to a Channel-Islands trustee does not pay a commission. The firm has imported the same posture into the firm's own commercial structure, because the firm's principal sources of work include fiduciaries and operating principals introduced by fiduciaries, and the architecture only works if the introducing fiduciary's posture is preserved.
The architecture is also straightforward to administer. There is no commission to track, no referral agreement to renew, no quarterly statement to reconcile, and no audit risk to manage. The firm's commercial system carries the principal's engagement on the firm's standard terms. The introducing fiduciary, where named, is recorded for relationship-management purposes only, not for compensation purposes. The administrative simplicity is a side-benefit, not the design goal, but it is one of the reasons the architecture is durable across jurisdictions and across professional codes.
The architecture rests on a set of boundaries that the firm does not cross. The boundaries are operational, not theoretical, and they are visible in the way the firm's engagements are structured.
The firm does not run legal services. US LLC and C-corp formation, contract drafting, litigation, IP filing, and US contractual review belong with US counsel. Home-jurisdiction legal work, including German GmbH, Austrian GmbH, Swiss AG, English Limited, Singapore Pte Ltd, Liechtenstein Anstalt or Stiftung, Channel-Islands trust, and other home-jurisdiction structuring, belongs with the principal's home counsel. The firm operates inside the legal structure those advisors have already put in place.
The firm does not run tax services. US tax residency, transfer pricing, US federal and state tax filings, US international tax planning, and US estate-tax exposure belong with US tax counsel. Home-jurisdiction tax planning, double-taxation treaty navigation, residency planning, and family-office tax structure belong with the principal's home tax advisors. The firm flags marketing decisions that may carry tax implications and defers to the principal's tax advisors before execution.
The firm does not run regulatory services. FDA, FCC, USDA, EPA, and other US regulatory licensing, US export-control, US sanctions compliance, and US securities-regulation work belong with US specialist counsel. Home-jurisdiction regulatory work, including BaFin, FMA, FINMA, FCA, MAS, FSA, KFSC, and other home-regulator engagement, belongs with the principal's home regulatory counsel. The firm does not represent the principal to any regulator, in any jurisdiction.
The firm does not run fiduciary services. The firm is not a trustee, not a foundation officer, not a family-office officer, not a trust protector, not a foundation council member, and not a fiduciary in any jurisdiction. The firm does not advise on trust structure, foundation governance, family-office governance, succession planning, or estate planning. Where a marketing decision touches a trust, a foundation, a family-office governance question, or a succession question, the firm flags it and defers to the introducing fiduciary or the principal's other fiduciary advisors before execution. The boundary is precise: the firm operates the US-facing commercial marketing architecture; the fiduciary operates the structure underneath.
The boundaries are documented in the firm's scope of services. The boundaries are also restated in the engagement-letter language at the start of every engagement. They are not aspirational; they are operational. Where a principal asks the firm to step outside the boundaries, the firm declines and refers the principal back to the appropriate specialist, which in many cases is the introducing fiduciary or a member of the introducing fiduciary's professional network.
The introduction process is deliberately simple. The simplicity is part of what preserves the fiduciary's posture: there is no signed agreement, no formal onboarding, no commercial commitment from the fiduciary, and no requirement for the fiduciary to disclose anything beyond what the fiduciary chooses to disclose to the principal.
The fiduciary contacts the firm at partnerships@globalmarketing.agency. The contact email is sufficient. There is no separate fiduciary portal, no introducer code, no referral form, and no commercial onboarding. The fiduciary describes the principal's situation at whatever level of detail the fiduciary judges appropriate, and indicates the fiduciary's preferred level of involvement in the engagement: present in the discovery conversation, not present, available on call as needed, or fully outside the working room. The firm responds within one business day.
The discovery conversation is then scheduled. The conversation is typically held with the principal and the fiduciary together, with the principal alone, or with the principal's US-based country head or US-based operating principal, depending on the situation and the fiduciary's preference. The conversation surfaces the US operating problem, the principal's existing US-facing materials and US operating structure, the corridor of US procurement or US commercial activity that has stalled, and the principal's commercial expectations. The conversation does not surface the principal's wider portfolio, the principal's home-base structure, the principal's family or estate situation, or any matter outside the scope of the US-facing commercial work, unless the principal volunteers it. Privacy is the default.
The firm scopes an engagement. A Market Entry Sprint is typical for a single US category correction and a first US-facing materials rebuild. A Cross-Border Build is typical for a full US rebuild across positioning, US-procurement-facing materials, US RFP architecture, US-facing site, and US commercial cadence. A Group Partnership is typical for family-office-backed holdings or multi-brand groups. The scope is presented to the principal directly. The principal engages the firm on the firm's standard commercial terms. The fiduciary is not part of the commercial engagement; the fiduciary's role is the introduction and, where the engagement requires it, the operational coordination on questions that touch the fiduciary's remit.
The fiduciary is named in the working room when the engagement requires fiduciary input and is not named when it does not. Where the US commercial work raises a question about US tax exposure, the fiduciary's tax network is brought in or, more often, the principal's existing US tax counsel is brought in. Where the work raises a question about US trust or foundation governance, the introducing fiduciary or the principal's existing fiduciary structure is brought in. Where the work is purely commercial and does not touch fiduciary matters, the fiduciary is not in the working room, and the firm does not consult the fiduciary on commercial decisions that the principal can make on the principal's own authority.
The principal's relationship architecture is preserved across the engagement. The fiduciary remains the principal's primary relationship. The firm operates as a specialist commercial provider on the engagement scope. The principal continues to read the fiduciary's advice as unconflicted, because the fiduciary's compensation is unchanged and the fiduciary's professional posture is unchanged. The relationship architecture the fiduciary has built over years is not disturbed.
The architecture is corridor-portable. The cultural surface differs across corridors; the structural fact, that commission-based referral introduces a conflict the fiduciary cannot afford to introduce, is consistent.
Zurich and Vaduz fiduciaries. The Swiss-Liechtenstein fiduciary register operates on a multi-decade tradition of unconflicted private-client and family-office advice. Zurich private-client lawyers, Zurich trust officers operating Liechtenstein and Swiss structures, and Vaduz Anstalt and Stiftung administrators all rest professionally on the principal's reading of the advice as unconflicted. Commission-based referral, even where technically permissible, is operationally avoided across most of the Zurich and Vaduz fiduciary base. The revenue-neutral architecture is the natural fit. For corridor reading, see the Zurich fiduciaries page.
London private-client lawyers. The City of London and the West End private-client legal market operates under SRA conduct rules and a multi-decade professional culture that treats commission-based referral with structural caution. Private-client partners at London firms regularly advise on US-facing commercial situations for principals with UK-based operating companies, US-based subsidiaries, or cross-Atlantic family-office structures. The revenue-neutral architecture sits cleanly inside the London professional posture. For corridor reading, see the London fiduciaries page.
Geneva trust officers. The Geneva trust and family-office market operates under FINMA-supervised structures and the cantonal professional culture that has made Geneva a primary international fiduciary centre. Geneva trust officers regularly identify US commercial situations in beneficiary or settlor portfolios that require US-facing commercial rebuild. The revenue-neutral architecture preserves the trust officer's posture in the trust relationship.
Singapore single-family-office principals. The Singapore single-family-office and multi-family-office market has expanded across the past decade and operates under MAS supervision with a culture of unconflicted advice to the principal. Singapore family-office principals regularly identify US-facing operating situations in principal-controlled US operating companies and US-based portfolio investments. The revenue-neutral architecture is the operating posture the family-office principal expects.
Dubai DIFC family offices. The DIFC family-office sector has emerged as a primary Gulf private-client centre and operates under DFSA supervision with a professional culture imported in part from London and Zurich. Dubai DIFC family-office principals regularly identify US commercial situations in US-based portfolio operating companies and US-facing acquisition targets. The revenue-neutral architecture preserves the family-office principal's posture in the principal relationship.
Beyond these primary corridors, the architecture is also operating with Channel-Islands fiduciaries, Crown-Dependency trustees, Liechtenstein Stiftung administrators, and select continental-European private-client networks. The corridor-specific work is in the underlying US operating engagement; the introduction architecture does not change.
A short, explicit list to mark the boundaries from the principal's reading point. No commission, finder's fee, or referral compensation flows from the firm to any introducing fiduciary, in any form, in any jurisdiction. No information about the principal's wider portfolio, beyond what is operationally relevant to the engagement, is requested or used. The principal's home-jurisdiction trust, foundation, family-office, or holding-company structure is operational context, not a commercial subject of the firm's engagement. The principal's tax position, residency planning, estate-planning, or succession planning is not a subject of the firm's work and is referred to the principal's tax counsel and fiduciary advisors.
The firm does not market to the principal's wider network without the principal's explicit, separate authorisation. An engagement with one principal does not produce, by default, outreach to that principal's family members, business partners, advisors, or beneficiaries. The principal can choose to introduce additional principals to the firm, on the same revenue-neutral architecture; the firm does not initiate that outreach. This protects the principal's relationship architecture and protects the introducing fiduciary's standing across the principal's wider network.
The firm does not appear in the principal's regulatory filings, tax filings, or fiduciary reporting except where the firm's services are billed and the billing produces a line item that flows through the principal's accounting. The firm is a commercial vendor, not a fiduciary, not an advisor of record on tax or legal matters, and not a participant in the principal's governance structure. The accounting line is the firm's only documentary footprint in the principal's structure, and the firm makes no claim to any other footprint.
The firm does not solicit or accept any form of inducement from the principal's other advisors, the principal's vendors, the principal's bank, or the principal's investment counterparties. The firm's compensation is the principal's payment for the firm's work, and nothing else. This restriction extends across the firm's entire revenue base and is not unique to fiduciary-introduced engagements.
The recurring case archetype illustrates the architecture in operating form. The names below are illustrative, not specific to any actual principal.
A Swiss family-office principal owns a Swiss specialty-chemicals operating company that has acquired a US specialty-chemicals subsidiary three years prior. The home Swiss business is profitable; the US subsidiary is consuming working capital and is not advancing in US enterprise procurement at the rate the family-office investment committee expected. The principal's primary fiduciary, a Zurich private-client lawyer with multi-decade standing in the relationship, identifies the pattern in the quarterly review with the family-office investment committee. The lawyer recognises that the principal needs US commercial architecture rebuilt. The lawyer is not equipped to deliver the work and would not deliver it if equipped. The lawyer also will not introduce on commission, because the lawyer's standing in the principal relationship rests on multi-decade unconflicted posture.
The lawyer contacts partnerships@globalmarketing.agency. The lawyer describes the principal's situation in three paragraphs and indicates a preference to be present in the discovery conversation but not in the operational working room. The firm responds within one business day. The discovery conversation is scheduled with the principal, the family-office head of operating investments, the Zurich lawyer, and the firm. The conversation surfaces the US specialty-chemicals procurement context, the US subsidiary's existing US-facing materials, the US procurement category in which the subsidiary is failing to advance, and the family-office's commercial expectations.
The firm scopes a Cross-Border Build. The principal engages the firm on standard commercial terms. The Zurich lawyer is named for relationship-management purposes and is not in the operational working room. Over three to six months, the firm rebuilds the US-facing commercial architecture for the US specialty-chemicals subsidiary against the four-filter US procurement frame, with US category anchor, US past-performance, US peer-set comparables, and US-procurement risk architecture in the lead position. The US-facing site, the US-procurement-facing materials, the US RFP architecture, and the US commercial cadence are rebuilt. The US country head, hired separately by the principal through the principal's chosen executive search firm, joins into the rebuilt operating environment.
The fiduciary's posture across the engagement is unchanged. The lawyer continues to advise the principal on Swiss legal, structuring, and family-governance questions. The lawyer is consulted by the firm only when an engagement decision touches a question inside the lawyer's professional remit, with the principal's authorisation. The principal's reading of the lawyer's advice across the engagement is the same as the principal's reading before the engagement. The principal got the work; the fiduciary preserved the standing; the firm was paid the principal's standard commercial rate. No commission flowed to the lawyer at any point.
The case archetype is the operating form of the architecture. It is replicable across corridors, across operating-company types, and across principal structures. The variables in any specific case are the corridor, the operating company, and the procurement category. The architecture is the constant.
The fiduciary's standing is the architecture. The firm operates inside it. No commission flows. The principal's reading of the fiduciary's advice is unchanged. The work is delivered. The relationship architecture is preserved across the engagement and across the years that follow. House view on revenue-neutral fiduciary introduction architecture
The architecture is operationally simple, but the question of when to introduce and when not to introduce is professional judgement. A few markers worth naming.
The fiduciary refers when the principal has a US operating situation that has stopped working at the commercial layer, and where the home-base structure, the home-base commercial engine, and the home-base advisory architecture are intact. The US commercial layer is the layer that the firm is built to address. Where the principal's situation is structural rather than commercial, the firm is not the right introduction.
The fiduciary refers when the principal has the operating capacity to engage on a Sprint, Build, or Partnership scope. The firm's engagements require the principal to commit time and operating attention; the work is not delegable purely to a country head or a US team without the principal's involvement at the strategic layer. Where the principal's bandwidth is constrained at the structural or fiduciary layer, the work may not land cleanly. The fiduciary's judgement on the principal's bandwidth is part of the introduction.
The fiduciary does not refer when the principal's situation is a pure legal, tax, regulatory, or fiduciary question. The firm does not run those services and would refer back. Where the situation is a US legal, tax, regulatory, or fiduciary question with a small commercial-marketing layer attached, the fiduciary refers the legal, tax, regulatory, or fiduciary work to the appropriate specialist, and may also refer the commercial layer to the firm. The two referrals are separate.
The fiduciary does not refer when the principal's commercial situation requires services the firm is not authorised to provide. Investment advice, financial advice, brokerage, asset management, custody, banking introductions, and securities work are outside the firm's scope. Where the principal needs those services, the introduction is to the appropriate financial-services specialist, often within the fiduciary's existing professional network.
The full referral architecture, the corridor-specific reading, and the engagement scoping for fiduciaries and advisors are detailed on the fiduciaries and advisors page. The structural problem the architecture solves is described on the fiduciary referral without commission problem page. The full scope of services is the operational boundary the firm operates inside. For engagement structure, see the engagements page.
Revenue-neutral fiduciary introduction architecture is the structure under which private-client lawyers, tax advisors, trust officers, foundation officers, and single-family-office principals route principals into US operating engagements without referral commissions. No commission, finder's fee, success fee, or kickback is paid to the introducing fiduciary by the firm. The fiduciary's professional posture in the principal relationship is preserved: there is no commercial conflict between the fiduciary's advice and the firm's commercial interest. The principal is engaged on the firm's standard commercial terms. The fiduciary remains the principal's primary relationship and is named in the working room when the engagement requires fiduciary input. Introductions route through partnerships@globalmarketing.agency. The architecture is corridor-portable across Zurich, Vaduz, London, Geneva, Singapore, Dubai, and other private-client and family-office centres.
Commission-based referral creates a commercial conflict between the fiduciary's advice to the principal and the fiduciary's compensation from the receiving firm. Even where the fiduciary's professional standards permit a disclosed referral fee, and even where the principal accepts the disclosure, the structural reading from the principal's perspective shifts. The fiduciary is no longer perceived as advising on the principal's interest alone; the fiduciary is also perceived as benefitting from the principal's engagement of the receiving firm. In private-client, family-office, and trust contexts, where the fiduciary's standing rests on the perception of unconflicted counsel, the commission-based referral introduces friction the fiduciary cannot afford to introduce. The revenue-neutral architecture removes the commercial conflict by removing the commission. The fiduciary's posture is preserved.
The firm designs US commercial marketing architecture for the principal's US operating company or operating portfolio. This includes US-facing positioning, US-procurement-facing materials, US RFP and RFQ response architecture, US-facing principal bios, US references, US-facing site, and US commercial cadence. The firm does not run legal, tax, regulatory, fiduciary, accounting, or audit services. US LLC and C-corp formation, US tax residency, transfer pricing, FDA and other US regulatory licensing, US banking introductions, IP filing, trust and estate structuring, foundation governance, and visa support belong with the principal's specialist counsel and the introducing fiduciary's professional network. The firm operates inside the structure the fiduciary and the principal's specialists have already put in place. When a marketing decision carries legal, tax, regulatory, or fiduciary implications, the firm flags it and defers before execution.
The fiduciary contacts partnerships@globalmarketing.agency with a brief description of the principal's situation, the US operating moment, and the fiduciary's preferred level of involvement in the engagement. The firm responds within one business day. A discovery conversation is scheduled, typically with the principal and the fiduciary together, sometimes with the principal alone if the fiduciary prefers. The discovery conversation surfaces the US operating problem, the principal's existing US-facing materials, and the corridor of US procurement or US commercial activity that has stalled. The firm scopes a Sprint, a Build, or a Partnership and the principal engages the firm on the firm's standard commercial terms. No commission flows to the fiduciary. The fiduciary remains the principal's primary relationship and is named in the working room as the engagement requires.
The architecture is corridor-portable. Zurich and Vaduz fiduciaries, Geneva trust officers, London private-client lawyers, Singapore single-family-office principals, Dubai DIFC family-office principals, and Channel-Islands and Crown-Dependency fiduciaries all operate in jurisdictions where the fiduciary's standing rests on the perception of unconflicted counsel. The revenue-neutral architecture preserves that posture in each. The specific cultural surface differs across corridors. The structural fact, that commission-based referral introduces a conflict the fiduciary cannot afford to introduce in the principal relationship, is consistent. The introduction architecture does not change across corridors. The corridor-specific work is in the underlying US operating engagement, which is shaped by the principal's home base, the principal's industry, and the principal's US procurement or US commercial trajectory.
The audience overview for private-client lawyers, trust officers, foundation officers, and single-family-office principals introducing principals into US operating engagements.
See the audience →Zurich private-client lawyers, trust officers operating Liechtenstein and Swiss structures, and family-office principals into US operating engagements.
See the Zurich fiduciaries gate →London private-client lawyers, trust officers, and family-office principals into US operating engagements through the revenue-neutral architecture.
See the London fiduciaries gate →The structural problem the revenue-neutral architecture solves. Why commission-based referral breaks fiduciary posture, and what to put in its place.
Read the problem →The operating boundary the firm runs inside. What the firm does, and the legal, tax, regulatory, and fiduciary services that belong with specialist counsel.
See the scope →Market Entry Sprint, Cross-Border Build, Group Partnership.
See the engagements →