Glossary · Automotive

PPAP: Production Part Approval Process.

The Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) standard for automotive component supplier approval, defining the documentation package that demonstrates a supplier's production process can produce parts meeting customer requirements consistently.

Definition.

The Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) is published by the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) as the AIAG PPAP manual, with the Fourth Edition (2006) the current reference. PPAP is the formal mechanism by which an automotive component supplier obtains customer approval for production parts. The supplier submits a defined documentation package demonstrating that engineering design and specification requirements are properly understood and that the production process has the capability to produce parts meeting those requirements consistently during an actual production run at the quoted production rate.

Five submission levels are defined. Level 1 requires only the Part Submission Warrant (PSW). Level 2 requires PSW with product samples and limited supporting data. Level 3 is the default and requires PSW with product samples and complete supporting data. Level 4 is customer-defined. Level 5 requires PSW with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at the supplier's manufacturing site rather than submitted to the customer. The customer specifies the level for each part.

The 18 PPAP elements include the design record, authorised engineering change documents, customer engineering approval, design FMEA, process flow diagram, process FMEA, control plan, measurement system analysis (MSA) studies, dimensional results, material and performance test results, initial process studies, qualified laboratory documentation, appearance approval report (AAR), sample production parts, master sample, checking aids, customer-specific requirements, and the Part Submission Warrant. Detroit Three OEMs (Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis North America) and most global OEMs operating in the US require PPAP submission. The European VDA 2 PPF process serves a comparable function but is not directly substitutable for AIAG PPAP at US OEM plants.

Where this matters.

For a European Tier 1 or Tier 2 supplier moving from VDA 2 PPF documentation in DACH OEM programmes to AIAG PPAP submissions for US OEM programmes, the format, terminology, and customer-specific requirements all differ. The corridor mechanics for DACH automotive suppliers, including PPAP and IATF 16949 alignment, are detailed in the German automotive suppliers into US OEM Tier 1 pillar.

Customer-specific requirements (CSRs) layer on top of the AIAG PPAP baseline and differ by OEM, with Ford Q1, GM BIQS, and Stellantis CSL Suppliers each adding specific requirements that the supplier must meet alongside AIAG PPAP.

Further on automotive supplier corridors.

Pillar

German automotive suppliers into US OEM Tier 1.

The corridor view. PPAP, APQP, IATF 16949, and the customer-specific requirements that govern Detroit Three OEM access.

Read the pillar →
Glossary

APQP.

Advanced Product Quality Planning. The AIAG framework for automotive product development discipline.

See the entry →
Glossary

IATF 16949.

The international quality management system standard for automotive sector suppliers.

See the entry →

If PPAP submissions are being prepared for a US OEM programme.

Describe the OEM, the part family, the customer-specific requirements, and the current submission level. Response within one business day.

Start the conversation
Start the conversation