Market Entry Sprint
Six to ten weeks. Sell-side commercial-layer rebuild ahead of a competitive process. Typical first engagement when the process is twelve weeks away and the target needs to land readable.
See the Sprint →
For cross-border sell-side principals, cross-border buy-side corporate-development heads, and PE platforms operating cross-border M&A in 2026, where AI-driven target screening, document diligence, regulatory review, and integration planning have rewritten what makes a cross-border target readable inside a competitive process.
Cross-border M&A processes are the most AI-leveraged subset of the M&A market because the cross-border dimension multiplies the diligence surface. A US PE platform looking at a DACH target faces FDA, FedRAMP, CMMC, ITAR, and EAR on one side and MDR, GDPR, EU AI Act, and DORA on the other, plus the commercial signal across two distinct procurement contexts. AI compresses the diligence and the regulatory cross-mapping.
For the cross-border sell-side, the consequence is that AI-readable targets win shortlist position before the human deal team has read the materials. Targets that arrive in the AI layer with poorly structured metadata, fragmented regulatory posture, or jurisdiction-shaped commercial materials are filtered out at the screening stage.
GMA does not provide investment banking, M&A advisory, financial diligence, or legal-diligence services. The deal stays with the client's banker, counsel, and financial-diligence specialist. GMA does not produce data-room contents.
GMA rebuilds the cross-border commercial layer that determines how a target reads inside AI-driven M&A workflows:
Cross-border sell-side principal or owner approaching a competitive process inside twelve months. Cross-border buy-side corporate-development head or PE platform pursuing multi-jurisdiction acquisitions. Revenue band twenty-five million to two billion dollars at group level. Commitment to commercial-layer rebuild alongside the M&A workflow.
Out of scope. Investment banking stays with the client's banker. Financial diligence stays with the client's financial-diligence specialist. Legal diligence stays with counsel. M&A negotiation stays with the banker and counsel. Quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and accounting work stay with the client's accountants. Data-room contents stay with the banker.
Six to ten weeks. Sell-side commercial-layer rebuild ahead of a competitive process. Typical first engagement when the process is twelve weeks away and the target needs to land readable.
See the Sprint →Three to six months. Buy-side platform building cross-border acquisition capability with AI-readable target-screening posture, integration-readiness narrative, and post-close commercial frame.
See the Build →Monthly retainer, twelve-month minimum. Buy-side platforms operating ongoing multi-jurisdiction M&A. Pricing is confirmed in discovery, not on the public site.
See the Partnership →No investment banking, no M&A advisory, no financial diligence, no legal diligence, no M&A negotiation, no quality-of-earnings, no working-capital analysis, no accounting work, and no data-room production. Those belong with the client's banker, counsel, financial-diligence specialist, and accountants. GMA's work is the commercial-signal layer that sits around the data room and inside the AI-readable surface that screening and integration agents read.
No. GMA does not produce data-room contents and does not manage the room. GMA rebuilds the commercial-signal layer that sits around the data room and that AI screening agents read.
No. The investment bank runs the process. GMA addresses the commercial-signal layer.
No. Legal diligence stays with client's counsel. Financial diligence and quality-of-earnings stay with the client's accountants and financial-diligence specialist. M&A negotiation stays with the banker and counsel.
Inquiry through the contact form and a discovery conversation. Sprint, Build, and Group Partnership are available. Pricing is confirmed in discovery, not on the public site.
The agent-reading layer that operates against suppliers in B2B procurement, structurally similar to the screening layer in M&A.
Read the page →The brand-and-positioning risks that surface for an acquirer evaluating a cross-border target's US-facing layer.
See the problem →The diligence-stage reading of the US-facing commercial layer that PE platforms now apply to cross-border targets.
Read the piece →