Cross-Border Build
Three to six months. Typical entry for cross-mapping commercial-layer rebuild across customer-facing trust architecture, procurement collateral, and AI-readable schema.
See the Build →
For cross-border companies operating under SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, FedRAMP, CMMC, MDR, EU AI Act, DORA, and equivalents in parallel, where AI-driven compliance cross-mapping is becoming the only economically viable way to maintain unified posture without duplicating effort five or six times.
A US AI healthcare company serving the EU inherits FDA 510(k), MDR, GDPR, EU AI Act, SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 obligations at minimum. A UAE-based fintech serving EU customers inherits DORA, GDPR, EU AI Act, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ADGM FSRA obligations. A DACH industrial firm with US federal customers inherits ITAR, EAR, CMMC, FedRAMP, ISO 9001, IATF 16949, and GDPR obligations.
The cross-mapping problem is structural, not optional. AI is increasingly the only realistic engine to maintain control unification across these stacks without proportionally expanding the compliance and legal team. The work splits cleanly. Counsel handles legal. Engineering handles implementation. The commercial layer is the third workstream and it sits with GMA.
GMA does not provide legal compliance advice. GMA does not implement compliance-automation software, does not draft policy, and does not produce audit evidence. Those workstreams stay with the client's counsel, IT, and compliance functions, and with the platform vendor where applicable.
GMA rebuilds the commercial layer that surfaces the cross-mapped compliance posture in a form that customers, partners, and procurement organisations across multiple jurisdictions can read uniformly:
Cross-border firm operating under three or more major regulatory frameworks simultaneously. Revenue band twenty-five million to two billion dollars. Compliance-automation platform selected and being implemented (Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, Hyperproof, Sprinto, or equivalent). Commitment to commercial-layer rebuild aligned to cross-mapped posture.
Out of scope. Compliance-automation software implementation stays with the client's IT and counsel. Policy drafting stays with counsel. Audit evidence production stays with the compliance team and counsel. AI-vendor selection is the client's prerogative.
Three to six months. Typical entry for cross-mapping commercial-layer rebuild across customer-facing trust architecture, procurement collateral, and AI-readable schema.
See the Build →Monthly retainer, twelve-month minimum. Ongoing posture maintenance across a changing regulatory environment, where the EU AI Act, DORA, and emerging APAC rules continue to shift the commercial-layer requirements.
See the Partnership →Six to ten weeks. Available where one regulator's reading carries the immediate pressure (a single EU member state, a single FedRAMP package, a single UAE customer's onboarding).
See the Sprint →GMA does not provide legal compliance advice on any of the frameworks named on this page. GMA does not implement Drata, Vanta, Secureframe, Hyperproof, Sprinto, or any compliance-automation platform. GMA does not draft policy, does not produce audit evidence, does not select AI vendors, and does not interpret regulator-specific obligations on the client's behalf. The commercial-layer rebuild operates downstream of the compliance posture counsel and engineering have set.
No. Implementation is done by the client's IT and compliance functions. GMA rebuilds the commercial-layer narrative that operates over the implemented platform.
No. GMA does not provide legal compliance advice. Legal compliance work continues with the client's counsel. GMA addresses the commercial-layer narrative that the customer, partner, and procurement organisation reads.
No. Audit evidence production stays with the client's compliance team and counsel. GMA does not draft policy and does not produce control evidence.
Inquiry through the contact form and a discovery conversation. Build and Group Partnership are typical entry. Pricing is confirmed in discovery, not on the public site.
The horizontal EU regulation that reaches AI systems operating inside EU borders regardless of provider jurisdiction.
Read the page →The parallel EU regulation reaching ICT third-party providers serving EU financial entities.
Read the page →The procurement-agent layer that reads the cross-mapped trust architecture before any human procurement analyst does.
Read the page →